• Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
  • Hormone Therapy
  • Genomic Testing
  • Next-Generation Imaging
  • UTUC
  • OAB and Incontinence
  • Genitourinary Cancers
  • Kidney Cancer
  • Men's Health
  • Pediatrics
  • Female Urology
  • Sexual Dysfunction
  • Kidney Stones
  • Urologic Surgery
  • Bladder Cancer
  • Benign Conditions
  • Prostate Cancer

Inflammatory biomarkers show high prognostic value in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Article

Investigators assessed integration of mGPS for risk stratification based on data from the phase 3 IMmotion151 study and the phase 2 IMmotion150 study.

The modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), based on C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin, 2 inflammatory biomarkers found in the blood, demonstrated the ability to predict responses and outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), according to a post hoc analysis published in JAMA Oncology.1,2

On-treatment mGPS showed superior prognostic information compared with IRC-RECIST, with a C-index of .651 for on-treatment mGPS vs .574 for IRC-RESIST.

On-treatment mGPS showed superior prognostic information compared with IRC-RECIST, with a C-index of .651 for on-treatment mGPS vs .574 for IRC-RESIST.

For the study, investigators assessed the use of on-treatment mGPS compared with radiologic staging alone based on data from the phase 3 IMmotion151 study (NCT02420821) and the phase 2 IMmotion150 study (NCT01984242). The IMmotion151 discovery cohort included a total of 915 patients, of whom 861 had evaluable baseline mGPS and 691 had evaluable on-treatment mGPS. The IMmotion150 validation cohort consisted of 305 patients, of whom 199 had evaluable on-treatment mGPS.

All patients received atezolizumab (Tecentriq) (plus bevacizumab [Avastin]) or sunitinib (Sutent) for the management of mRCC. Survival analyses were based on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Among patients in the IMmotion151 cohort, 17 of 181 (21.0%) patients classified as having high-risk disease at baseline by the mGPS died prior to initial radiologic staging, compared with 4 of 94 (.8%) of patients with low-risk disease and 20 of 286 (7.0%) of those with intermediate-risk disease.

During the on-treatment analysis, mGPS showed significant prognostic information for low- and intermediate-risk subgroups. Among patients with intermediate-risk disease at baseline, 37.4% improved to on-treatment low-risk and experienced a 12-month OS of 92.8%. In comparison, 50.9% of patients remained at intermediate risk and experienced a 12-month OS of 74.7%, and 11.7% deteriorated to high risk and had a 12-month OS of 50.3%.

Further, patients in the intermediate-risk group at baseline who progressed to low-risk disease had a 12-month PFS of 57.3%, compared with a PFS of 13.6% among those who deteriorated to high-risk.

The investigators also compared mGPS with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), assessed by an independent review committee (IRC-RECIST). On-treatment mGPS showed superior prognostic information compared with IRC-RECIST, with a C-index of .651 (95% CI, 0.588-0.714) for on-treatment mGPS vs .574 for IRC-RESIST (95% CI, 0.528-0.619). Further, on-treatment mGPS demonstrated independent prognostic value in predicting outcomes among patients in the disease control group compared with IRC-RECIST (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, .89-3.00; P = .11 for SD vs CR/PR).

In addition, on-treatment mGPS was able to identify a high-risk group (n = 26) of patients among those within the disease control group that had a comparable OS to patients who had progressive disease at initial staging (median OS, 17.1 vs 16.1 months; 12-month OS, 71.6% vs 66.5%).

Findings from the discovery cohort were validated using data from the IMmotion151 study. Investigators also found that on-treatment mGPS allowed for outcome prediction as early as 6 weeks (median 43 days) following the start of therapy.

“Because the first routine staging is usually performed 8 to 12 weeks after the start of therapy, early on-treatment mGPS could open a potential window for early therapy adjustments,” the authors wrote.

References

1. Saal J, Bald T, Eckstein M, et al. Integrating on-treatment modified Glasgow prognostic score and imaging to predict response and outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. JAMA Oncol. Published online June 22, 2023. Accessed June 28, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.1822

2. Study improves prediction of therapy response in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. News release. Universitätsklinikum Bonn. June 22, 2023. Accessed June 28, 2023. https://www.newswise.com/articles/improved-therapy-response-prediction-in-metastatic-renal-cell-carcinoma?sc=sphr&xy=10016681

Related Videos
Neal Shore, MD, FACS, and Brian M. Shuch, MD, experts on kidney cancer
Neal Shore, MD, FACS, and Brian M. Shuch, MD, experts on kidney cancer
David Braun, MD, PhD, and Patrick Kenney, MD, answer questions during a video interview
Video 2 - "Diagnostic Tests for Kidney Cancer"
Video 1 - "A Growing Incidence of Renal Masses"
Nazih Paul Khater, MD, FACS, answers a question during a Zoom video interview
Dr. Mayer Fishman in an interview with Urology Times
Dr. Laurence Albiges in an interview with Urology Times
Opioid pills | Image Credit: © BillionPhotos.com - stock.adobe.com
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.