Dr. Gill discusses clinical impact of the new wave of BPH treatments
October 23rd 2022In this installment of Urology Times’ 50th Anniversary Innovation Celebration, Bradley Gill, MD, MS, discusses the impact that the new wave of minimally invasive BPH treatments has had for both patients and urologists.
Dr. Gill explains the importance of BPH treatment innovations to urology
October 19th 2022“It’s pretty clear that over the past 50 years we've seen innovations in BPH treatment both from the utilization of technology and also from the patient outcome and experience standpoint,” says Bradley Gill, MD, MS.
Dr. Igel on role as SCS representative to the AUA residents and fellows committee
October 19th 2022“We have helped developed policies at the national level as far as parental leave for residents and fellows, helping to streamline a lot of that process with the American Board of Urology,” says Daniel Igel, MD.
Dr. Chughtai discusses new pilot study on Rezum treatment for BPH
October 18th 2022“We found that the adverse event rates have dropped dramatically, to about a third of what it was reported in the pivotal trial, but at the same time still had the same net benefits in terms of efficacy when it comes to Q max, symptomatic improvement, as well as PVR," said Bilal Chughtai, MD.
Vitamin D does not appear to improve OAB, incontinence symptoms
October 13th 2022“Even though this is a really large study, and it appears that vitamin D may not be a sole contributor to improving urinary incontinence or overactive bladder, there may be a subgroup of men who could potentially respond,” says Alayne Markland, DO.
Urology Times 50 Innovations Series: Multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer
October 5th 2022“From a screening perspective, mpMRI really has changed how we evaluate men at risk for prostate cancer. It has improved the selection of men for biopsy and certainly improved our diagnostic rates,” says William P. Parker, MD.
Dr. Linehan on her experience and learning curve with HIFU
September 28th 2022“I feel like [HIFU] provided patients this intermediary treatment option…It was less invasive than radiation and surgery, but still provided cancer control, or at least for some patients delayed the time until they needed a more radical treatment,” says Jennifer A. Linehan, MD.