Video
MOSES 2.0 upgrade for HoLEP demonstrates cost savings in BPH
Author(s):
“Even factoring in the increased number of emergency room visits, there was still an overall cost savings of $747 in favor of the Moses HoLEP. So, that was surprising to see,” says Matthew S. Lee, MD.
Video Player is loading.
In this video Matthew S. Lee, MD,discusses the background and findings of the Urology Practice study, “A cost comparison of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with and without Moses.” Lee is an endourology fellow at Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Related Videos
Karyn S. Eilber, MD, shares her reaction to genitourinary syndrome of menopause guidelines
Expert discusses the relationship between RCTs and real-world efficacy of prostate cancer treatments
Endourologist discusses shared decision-making and laser lithotripsy
Shreyas Joshi, MD, recaps AUA session on chemotherapy vs novel NMIBC options
Joshua J. Meeks, MD, PhD, discusses NIAGARA data for patient undergoing cystectomy
Shay Rajavel, MS3, on CO2 gas embolism during single-port partial nephrectomy
Kevin Zorn, MD, on preserving ejaculation with BPH therapies
Neal Shore, MD, on sasanlimab plus BCG for BCG-naïve NMIBC
Alexander Glaser, MD, on real-world outcomes with Aquablation
Vitaly Margulis, MD, on preliminary safety, efficacy of padeliporfin VTP for UTUC
Related Content
