Article

Pivotal data published for sacituzumab govitecan in bladder cancer

The data from the pivotal phase 2 TROPHY-U-01 trial supported the FDA approval of sacituzumab govitecan for the treatment of patients with urothelial carcinoma.

Results from the pivotal phase 2 TROPHY-U-01 trial, which led to the FDA accelerated approval of sacituzumab govitecan (Trodelvy) for advanced urothelial cancer, have now been published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.1,2

Data from cohort 1 of the study showed that at a median follow-up of 9.1 months, sacituzumab govitecan induced an overall response rate (ORR) of 27% in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) following the failure of both platinum-based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibition. Further, 77% of patients had a decrease in measurable disease.

There were 31 responders, including 6 (5%) complete responses (CRs) and 25 (22%) partial responses (PRs), according to findings presented during the 2020 ESMO Congress.3 The median response duration with the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) was 7.2 months.

“Sacituzumab govitecan is an active drug with a manageable safety profile with most common toxicities of neutropenia and diarrhea. Sacituzumab govitecan has notable efficacy compared with historical controls in pretreated mUC that has progressed on both prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimens and checkpoint inhibition,” principal investigator Scott T. Tagawa, MD, MS, FACP, professor of Medicine and Urology at Weill Cornell Medicine, an oncologist at New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, and coauthors wrote in their study conclusion.

The open-label, global phase 2 TROPHY-U-01 trial evaluated sacituzumab govitecan in 3 cohorts: patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who progressed on platinum-based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibition (cohort 1); those who were ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy and progressed following checkpoint inhibition (cohort 2); and those who never received checkpoint inhibitors but had progressed on platinum-based therapy (cohort 3).

In cohort 1, which patients received 10 mg/kg of the ADC on days 1 and 8, every 21 days and continued treatment until loss of clinical benefit or intolerable toxicity. The primary end point of this analysis was ORR per central review.

Among the evaluated patients, the median age was 66 years, with 23% of patients 75 years of age or older and 78% male. Moreover, the majority of patients were white, at 74%. Twenty-eight percent of patients had an ECOG performance status of 0, while 72% had a status of 1. Overall, 66.4% of patients had visceral metastases. The median number of prior anticancer regimens received was 3 (range, 1-8).

Sixteen (14%) of 113 evaluable patients continued to receive treatment with sacituzumab govitecan at the time of the analysis. The majority of patients who discontinued treatment did so because of disease progression (66%; n = 75). Only 7% (n = 8) of patients discontinued the ADC because of toxicity. Three percent of patients (n = 3) discontinued because of withdrawn consent and 3% (n = 3) died. The median time on treatment was 3.7 months, and the maximum time on treatment is 16 months thus far. Fifty-percent of patients (n = 56) are in follow-up for survival.

The median time to onset of response was 1.6 months. The ORR, median DOR, and median time to response reported were consistent with investigator assessments. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.4 and 10.9 months, respectively.

Regarding safety, diarrhea was the most commonly experienced treatment-related adverse effect, occurring in two-thirds of patients (all grade, 65%); this is consistent with what has been reported in prior studies with the ADC. However, most of these effects were grade 1/2.

Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in 9% of patients, with only 1% experiencing grade 4. Forty-six percent of patients experienced neutropenia, with 22% having a grade 3 effect and 12% reporting a grade 4 effect. Neutropenia was manageable and with dose reductions and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, it was reversible. Thirty-percent of patients received GCSF either as primary prophylaxis or in response to neutropenia, according to study investigators. Moreover, 1 treatment-related death was reported, with a patient presenting with sepsis due to febrile neutropenia.

To ensure clinicians closely monitor for these specific adverse events, the FDA label for sacituzumab govitecan includes a Boxed Warning for severe or life-threatening neutropenia and severe diarrhea.

The phase 3 TROPiCs-04 trial (NCT04527991), which is currently recruiting patients, is being launched to confirm these promising phase 2 results. Based on the FDA's accelerated approval policy, continued approval is based on findings from a confirmatory trial, such as TROPiCs-04.

References

1. Tagawa ST, Balar AV, Petrylak DP, et al. TROPHY-U-01: A phase II open-label study of sacituzumab govitecan in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma progressing after platinum-based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors [published online ahead of print April 30, 2021]. J Clin Oncol. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03489

2. FDA grants accelerated approval to sacituzumab govitecan for advanced urothelial cancer. Posted online April 13, 2021. Accessed May 7, 2021. https://bit.ly/3mI4xap.

Related Videos
1 expert is featured in this series.
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.