Rubenstein is compliance officer and medical director of coding and reimbursement, United Urology Group and Chesapeake Urology, in Towson, Maryland.
Why can’t CPT 50436 and 50437 be used when performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy?
October 14th 2022"For several reasons, the percutaneous nephrolithotomy codes needed to be revised, as the language of the descriptor and what was included and not included was confusing and ambiguous," write Jonathan Rubenstein, MD, and Mark Painter.
Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy code is coming
October 10th 2022On January 1, the following CPT code will be active: 55867 (laparoscopy, surgical prostatectomy, simple subtotal [including control of postoperative bleeding, vasectomy, meatotomy, urethral calibration and/or dilation, and internal urethrotomy], includes robotic assistance, when performed).
Urology Coding: Can CPT 51728 and 51741 be billed together?
July 12th 2022"There are a number of urodynamic tests that can be performed. Urodynamic studies are not a one-size-fits-all procedure, but rather the tests performed should be chosen based upon the patient presentation and the question that needs to be answered by the urodynamic studies," write Jonathan Rubenstein, MD, and Mark Painter.
What is the best way to report an encounter when both the kidney and bladder are imaged?
June 10th 2022"For appropriate billing and coding, there are 2 important issues to be satisfied: medical necessity and documentation supporting the performance of the procedure," write Jonathan Rubenstein, MD, and Mark Painter.
TURP reimbursement denied due to misinterpretation of parenthetical attached to code
July 8th 2021"Depending on the age of the surgeon, one may be surprised to hear that it was common to perform a vasectomy routinely on patients undergoing a TURP procedure," write Jonathan Rubenstein, MD, and Mark Painter.
What are the reimbursement implications when a patient brings their own catheter?
July 5th 2021"It is clear that if a practice were to require or encourage all or some of their patients to supply their own catheters, it would be considered a violation of your Medicare participation and could result in takebacks, fines, or even exclusion from Medicare," write Jonathan Rubenstein, MD, and Mark Painter.
Why CPT 38571 plus modifier 52 is recommended in this RALP case
May 25th 2021"Either way the service is reported, the payer should require documentation be submitted for review prior to payment, and the use of the –52 on the 38571 will provide more appropriate guidance for reimbursement processing," write Jonathan Rubenstein, MD, and Mark Painter.