Video

Factors for Consideration When Selecting Treatments for Patients with mCRPC

Author(s):

Stephen J. Freedland, MD

Stephen J. Freedland, MD, explains the treatment regimen he would have chosen for the patient with mCRPC in the presented case and outlines which factors, including clinical data, inform his treatment decision-making.

Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
      Related Videos
      Dr Louise Kostos answers a question during a Zoom video interview
      Dr Louise Kostos on the rapidly evolving prostate cancer treatment landscape
      Dr Louise Kostos answers a question during a Zoom video interview
      An expert’s view on combination ARPI/ADT and long-term toxicity in prostate cancer
      Rana McKay, MD, on the role of radium-223 in the modern era
      Rana McKay, MD, on the role of radium-223 in the modern era
      Dr Louise Kostos answers a question during a Zoom video interview
      Dr Louise Kostos discusses PSA kinetics in mHSPC
      Alicia Morgans, MD, MPH, answers a question during a Zoom video interview
      The importance of PSADT in high-risk, biochemically recurrent prostate cancer
      Neeraj Agarwal, MD, outlines data on enzalutamide plus talazoparib in mCRPC
      Neeraj Agarwal, MD, outlines data on enzalutamide plus talazoparib in mCRPC
      Prostate cancer cells dividing | Image Credit: © PRB ARTS - stock.adobe.com
      Expert discusses triplet regimens in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
      Alicia Morgans, MD, MPH, answers a question during a Zoom video interview
      Alicia Morgans, MD, MPH, on PSADT awareness and prostate cancer treatment initiation
      Dr Louise Kostos answers a question during a Zoom video interview
      Dr Louise Kostos discusses combination therapies in mHSPC
      Neeraj Agarwal, MD, on the design of the TALAPRO-2 trial
      Neeraj Agarwal, MD, on the design of the TALAPRO-2 trial
      Related Content
      Close-up shot of microscope with metal lens at laboratory. | Image Credit: © kkolosov - stock.adobe.com
      April 2nd 2025

      The importance of federal funding in cancer research: A call to action

      Michael S. Cookson, MD, MMHC
      "We must lobby to maintain our current funding levels and push for increased support to continue driving progress in cancer care," says Michael S. Cookson, MD, MMHC, FACS.
      Dr. Murphy on increasing diversity in cancer clinical trials
      February 29th 2024

      Dr. Murphy on increasing diversity in cancer clinical trials

      Urology Times staff
      In this podcast episode, Adam B. Murphy, MD, MBA, MSCI, discusses the need to increase diversity in clinical trials, specifically focusing on studies in prostate cancer.
      FDA approves expanded label for 177Lu-PSMA-617 in mCRPC
      March 28th 2025

      FDA approves expanded label for 177Lu-PSMA-617 in mCRPC

      Hannah Clarke
      The approval is supported by positive data from the phase 3 PSMAfore trial.
      Dr. Schwen on focal therapies for prostate cancer
      January 11th 2024

      Dr. Schwen on focal therapies for prostate cancer

      Cleveland Clinic
      Zeyad Schwen, MD, a urologic oncologist at Cleveland Clinic, discusses how patient factors and cancer characteristics are key to deciding between focal therapies and whole gland treatment for prostate cancer.
      Data reinforce isodose MHFRT as standard of care radiotherapy regimen
      March 22nd 2025

      Data reinforce isodose MHFRT as standard of care radiotherapy regimen

      Hannah Clarke
      “These findings reinforce isodose MHFRT as the standard of care, offering the same cancer control as conventional treatment but with fewer side effects than dose-escalated MHFRT,” says Amar U. Kishan, MD.
      Avoidance of prostate cancer screening linked to increased risk of PCSM
      March 21st 2025

      Avoidance of prostate cancer screening linked to increased risk of PCSM

      Hannah Clarke
      “Our study identifies that men who were invited for screening, but do not attend screening appointments are at significantly higher risk of dying from prostate cancer compared to men who were not offered screening or accepted an invitation for screening,” says Renée Leenen MD.
      © 2025 MJH Life Sciences

      All rights reserved.