Video Content above is prompted by the following:
- Discuss the findings from the PEACE III trial, which compared enzalutamide with enzalutamide plus radium-223 in patients with previously untreated castration-resistant prostate cancer that has metastasized to bone.
- Giving bone-protective agents (BPAs) to patients receiving radium-223 in PEACE III nearly eliminated risk for skeletal fracture (fracture incidence was 33% without BPAs and 3% with BPAs) (Tombal et al [2019])
- This is proving that enzalutamide doublet shouldn’t be used anymore. Radium-223 triplet on top of ARI doublet (in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer) is superior combination. Unless there’s a big safety signal, this study will now prove that radium-223 triplet beats enzalutamide doublet.
- In which patients would you consider using an enzalutamide–radium-223 combination? (Shariftabrizi et al [2023])
- What would be absolute or relative contraindications for radium-223 use?
- What bone support/monitoring strategies (eg, bone-protective agent use, bone density scans) are needed to improve safety of radium-223 in clinical practice? (Tombal et al [2019])
- What strategies would you recommend for increasing utilization for bone health in general for all metastatic patients?