Managing BCG-Unresponsive Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC): Clinical and Operational Perspectives : Episode 20
Opinion
Video
Adoption of New Treatments for BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC
Author(s):
A panelist discusses how the ability to administer newer non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) treatments in local urology practices rather than specialized oncology centers reduces patient burden and travel requirements while suggesting that increased education and support could help more health care providers adopt these treatment options.
Video Player is loading.
- From an operational standpoint, how important is it that these treatments can be administered by urologists locally, without the need to refer patients to oncology centers? Please discuss the overall burden on patients, systemic adverse effects, and the need to travel to specialized centers.
- What strategies would you recommend to encourage more health care practitioners to adopt newer treatment modalities for BCG-unresponsive NMIBC?
Related Videos
Future Directions of BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC Management
Navigating Treatment Choices and Financial Considerations in BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC
BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC: Balancing Care and Financial Considerations
The Impact of Gene Therapy and Advancements in BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC Treatment
Navigating BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC and Emerging Therapies
Enhancing Access to BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC Treatments
Reducing Resource Expenditure in Clinics with New Gene Therapies for BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC
Cost-Effectiveness and Patient Support in Treating BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC
Discussing Treatment Options for BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC
Advancements in BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC and the Impact of Trial Results and Long-Term Follow-Up
Related Content
