A panelist discusses how targeted gene therapy has revolutionized BCG-unresponsive non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) treatment through agents like nadofaragene firadenovec, which shows promising complete response rates at 3 months, though long-term follow-up remains crucial for assessing durability of response and comparing real-world outcomes with clinical trial data.
How has the introduction of targeted gene therapy changed the way you approach the management of BCG-unresponsive NMIBC?
What are the broader implications of using gene therapy to treat BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, and how does nadofaragene firadenovec fit into this landscape overall?
Data for newer therapies have shown that more than 50% of patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC experience a complete response after just 3 months of treatment. What are your thoughts on these findings?
How do these clinical trial outcomes compare with what you see in your clinical practice when treating patients with newer therapies?
Discuss the importance of long-term follow-up for patients receiving these newer treatments.
What is your experience in terms of durability of response?