Managing BCG-Unresponsive Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC): Clinical and Operational Perspectives : Episode 15
Opinion
Video
Enhancing Access to BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC Treatments
Author(s):
Max Kates, MD, discusses how the ability to deliver newer treatments in local urology clinics rather than specialized centers reduces patient travel burden and improves access to care, while suggesting that increased education about safety profiles and implementation protocols could encourage broader adoption among health care providers.
Video Player is loading.
- From an operational standpoint, how important is it that these treatments can be administered by urologists locally, without the need to refer patients to oncology centers? Please discuss overall burden on patients, systemic side effects, and travel to specialized centers
- What strategies would you recommend to encourage more HCPs to adopt newer treatment modalities for BCG-unresponsive NMIBC?
Related Videos
Future Directions of BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC Management
Adoption of New Treatments for BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC
Navigating Treatment Choices and Financial Considerations in BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC
BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC: Balancing Care and Financial Considerations
The Impact of Gene Therapy and Advancements in BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC Treatment
Navigating BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC and Emerging Therapies
Reducing Resource Expenditure in Clinics with New Gene Therapies for BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC
Cost-Effectiveness and Patient Support in Treating BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC
Discussing Treatment Options for BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC
Advancements in BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC and the Impact of Trial Results and Long-Term Follow-Up
Related Content
